Page 3 of 7

Re: North Korea

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 12:26 am
by nikotromus
HybridAmbassador wrote:
Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:29 pm
If he feels that his regime is to be facing oblivion, he has nothing else to lose so here goes the Missiles,
Targeted to USA, Japan, South Korea..
So - no benefit to attacking. He'll only act if he's forced to. That sounds like a natural, rational human behavior too me.

It seems to me that the USSA is working overtime to provoke a response. I'm sure they're dissapointed that it hasn't happened yet. Something tells me they'll find a way to get the fight going - response or no response.

If you want an insight into U.S. conflict initiation tactics, you should really check out Operation Northwoods from 1961. It's is a declassified, fascinating document handed to president Kennedy by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Many analysts feel that his refusal to go along with the plan ended his life. I never looked at U.S. foreign policy the same way after reading it.

Re: North Korea

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 4:22 pm
by HybridAmbassador
[/quote]
nikotromus wrote:
Sun Oct 15, 2017 12:26 am
HybridAmbassador wrote:
Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:29 pm
If he feels that his regime is to be facing oblivion, he has nothing else to lose so here goes the Missiles,
Targeted to USA, Japan, South Korea..
So - no benefit to attacking. He'll only act if he's forced to. That sounds like a natural, rational human behavior too me.

It seems to me that the USSA is working overtime to provoke a response. I'm sure they're dissapointed that it hasn't happened yet. Something tells me they'll find a way to get the fight going - response or no response.

If you want an insight into U.S. conflict initiation tactics, you should really check out Operation Northwoods from 1961. It's is a declassified, fascinating document handed to president Kennedy by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Many analysts feel that his refusal to go along with the plan ended his life. I never looked at U.S. foreign policy the same way after reading it.
So - no benefit to attacking. He'll only act if he's forced to. That sounds like a natural, rational human behavior too me.
Kim is doing the provocation without being forced to. What do you call the act of launching a ICBM type missile over Japan
and mostly over the US bases stationed in the same. He's aim is to finish the development of miniaturizing the nuke head to be able to load onto his developing ICBM. Once he accomplish it ( doubt he will see that day ) he will be demanding ransom fee to South Korea and Japan to not launch the projectile.

Re: North Korea

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 4:50 pm
by nikotromus
Testing their weapons systems. What countries threaten to reign down fire on the USA for testing their weapons systems? You already said they have no benefit in attacking another country, as they would be instantly dustified, so the motive for murdering millions of people with a pre-emtive invasion is to get them to stop testing their weapons systems? More of the weapons of mass destruction line?

The USA is now pushing 17 straight years of war with no end in sight. The wars are escalating, not de-escalating. I don't see it ending well for the planet.

Re: North Korea

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 5:05 pm
by GringoVikingo
NK just fired 3 missils, and and D.T will hold a speach wery soon from W.H.

Re: North Korea

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 5:18 pm
by tiagoabner
It fell between Japan and SK, per Japanese media, quite close to the Japanese exclusive economic zone.

Re: North Korea

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 5:57 pm
by HybridAmbassador
Well, now wanting to see if Trumpfster will come good in his promises that, if another Missile test flew, there will be 3 US Air Craft carrier nearby and each loaded with least 60 fighter planes ready to pinpoint surgical strike?

Re: North Korea

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 6:21 pm
by tiagoabner
SK is doing "precision, surgical precision strike" missile drill as we speak.

Re: North Korea

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 6:57 pm
by GringoVikingo
This is bad carma even for a atheist as me.

Re: North Korea

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 7:42 pm
by eeuunikkeiexpat
I can ship out an iodine solution, don't have to wait 3 months for your order of potassium iodide to get here assuming stocks "up north" are not wiped out in 24 hours.

I worry about the future warranty or servicing of my Korean elctrodometicos products though...

:alien:

Re: North Korea

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 7:50 pm
by nikotromus
Here comes crazy time. I'ts been hiding for a while. Everybody panic!!!

Re: North Korea

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 5:23 pm
by admin
Yea north korea to chile, 11,000 miles and change.

North korea Missile range 8000 miles and change.

Yep still good.

But trump might want to consider moving to another neighborhood.

no, on second thought, Stay right where you are at Trump.

Re: North Korea

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 5:42 pm
by nwdiver
I worry about Vancouver.........just saying a DC bound missle may end up anywhere........