OCEANFRONT TITLE RESTRICTIONS

Buying, Selling, Building, Tax issues, anything regarding real estate or properties in Chile.
Forum rules
NO DISCUSSION OF SPECIFIC REAL ESTATE AGENTS BY NAME, LINK, OR RECOMMENDATION ANYWHERE ON THE CHILE FORUM.
rfinmdusa
Rank: Chile Forum Full Member
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:17 pm

OCEANFRONT TITLE RESTRICTIONS

Post by rfinmdusa » Thu Jul 14, 2011 9:47 am

Hi All,

I've been on this forum previously but my account seems to have been removed some time ago. I got a new account so here goes.

My wife and I have been looking for oceanfront property in Chile for several years now. We live in the US and want to spend Jan-March in Chile when we retire. We are looking for oceanfront property from approximately Valdivia south. I have made 3 trips in the past 3 years driving along the coast scouting areas and we are considering several properties at the moment.

The issues that have come up that we are not sure about have to do with does anyone actually own the land up to the ocean. We have been told that there is a 50 meter strip in front of all properties from the mean high tide that no one can own. Also if a new title is issued for the property the 50 meters changes to 300 meters in case the Navy needs to build on the land for national defense. We don't think the Navy will need any of the properties we are considering but the 50-300 meter issue brings up another potential issue with people putting sheds on the beach areas to keep there seaweed harvesting equipment on. The term "Alguleros" is what we have herd as to the people that harvest seaweeds/kelp/? So our questions are;
1. Does anyone know about the new title 300 meter vs 50 meter?
2. Do the Alguleros have a right to put their sheds on the 50 meter strip?
3. Can they live in the sheds or make the shed more of a house than a shed?
4. Are there squatters rights in Chile? We were told a long time ago that there is no squatters rights in Chile but don't know how the Algulero sheds fit into this.

Not the average where can I find... type question but any help on this would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Ray

User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 21834
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 11:02 pm
Location: Frutillar, Chile
Contact:

Re: OCEANFRONT TITLE RESTRICTIONS

Post by admin » Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:48 am

It is 8 meters from the highest tide. You must in theory provide for public access, if there is not already a natural access. You can be forced to open access, but it is a rather lengthy process that generally only occures with prime public tourist spots.

As for squaters, there are no squater rights in chile.

The fishermen you are refering to building shacks are squatting, but on public property.
It is up to the goverment to boot them.

The closest thing to squater rights is there
is a system by which title can be cleared if some one sits on a property for many years, but that is very specialized set of laws that has been overturned by the courts a lot recently when it has been abused for squating in the sense that you think about squatting.
Spencer Global Chile: Legal, relocation, and Investment assistance in Chile.
For more information visit: https://www.spencerglobal.com

From USA and outside Chile dial 1-917-727-5985 (U.S.), in Chile dial 65 2 42 1024 or by cell 747 97974.

rfinmdusa
Rank: Chile Forum Full Member
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:17 pm

Re: OCEANFRONT TITLE RESTRICTIONS

Post by rfinmdusa » Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:55 am

Thanks for clarifying the issues. Big difference between 8 and 50 meters in our opinion.

User avatar
nwdiver
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
Posts: 3093
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 8:45 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC and Chile where ever it's Summer
Contact:

Re: OCEANFRONT TITLE RESTRICTIONS

Post by nwdiver » Thu Jul 14, 2011 4:24 pm

I have looked at water front properties that would entirely be within the 50m distance of high water, that are privately owned.

It is interesting that Chile has taken a piece of British Common Law on riparian right of access to the beach, but not so strange I guess when you look at Chiles maritime tradition and its connection with England on maritime matters.
It's all about the wine.

User avatar
otravers
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
Posts: 1212
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 9:48 am
Location: Concón, Region V

Re: OCEANFRONT TITLE RESTRICTIONS

Post by otravers » Thu Jul 14, 2011 8:09 pm

Between the risk of tsunamis and regular storms, we're happy to *not* be directly on the beach, but rather on the other side of the road, behind and above another house. We're still just 50 meters from the ocean, but more importantly about 20 meters above it. I'd think long and hard before buying anything less than 10 meters above sea level. We had waves of 5-6 meters a few weeks ago in Concon.

User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 21834
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 11:02 pm
Location: Frutillar, Chile
Contact:

Re: OCEANFRONT TITLE RESTRICTIONS

Post by admin » Thu Jul 14, 2011 9:54 pm

The last Tsunami, reached heights of 30 meters in some parts of the Chilean coast and went km in land.
Spencer Global Chile: Legal, relocation, and Investment assistance in Chile.
For more information visit: https://www.spencerglobal.com

From USA and outside Chile dial 1-917-727-5985 (U.S.), in Chile dial 65 2 42 1024 or by cell 747 97974.

User avatar
eeuunikkeiexpat
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
Posts: 8162
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:38 am
Location: Megalith of unknown origin near my digs, south V Region coast

Re: OCEANFRONT TITLE RESTRICTIONS

Post by eeuunikkeiexpat » Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:17 pm

Better to be on a hill around a kilo from the beach that also happens to be an official tsunami evacuation route...

The recent freak multi-day wave event caused more damage just south of here than the tsunami. The lower part of the beach of Santo Domingo has been completely eroded away. A three foot drop separates the still sandy upper beach and the rocky lower beach. The waves covered the upper beach and reached the sidewalk and evidently began undermining the foundation.
There are two ways to be fooled.

One is to believe what isn't true;

the other is to refuse to believe what is true.

- Søren Kierkegaard

User avatar
zer0nz
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
Posts: 5779
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 4:46 am
Location: Lost!
Contact:

Re: OCEANFRONT TITLE RESTRICTIONS

Post by zer0nz » Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:05 pm

patagoniax wrote:.
It seems as though there may be some additional considerations in the "oceanfront title restrictions" topic.

Apparently the Bachelet administration made some sort of deal or promise to a deal with indigenous groups to rights to a considerable portion of the Los Ríos (XIV región) coast. The Mapuche coalition is now demanding rights to about 75 percent of the coastline in that region, much of which is already privately owned (above the high tide line). One of the effects of the pending resolution has been a virtual halt to commercial concessions and similar development along that coastline. In theory, a foreigner who sought to acquire coastline property in this region, unaware of this issue and the ongoing deliberations, could be caught up in the evolving conflict (ergo, the Mapuche are known to use Real Bullets when such redistribution programmes don't work in their favour). Right now the discussions on implementation are said to be seeking to not displace those with current businesses such as fisheries in this coastal area. However, a vacant property not involved in such commercial use could be subject to what may ultimately become a sort of expropriation. The programme would allow the Mapuches to "administer" up to about 75 percent of that region's coastal area. In addition, the success of the Mapuches in obtaining rights to the coastal strip has had the effect of magnifying their parallel efforts to obtain additional lands already in private cultivation elsewhere in the region.

Recent article, in the language of the realm: http://diario.elmercurio.com/2011/09/25 ... 48029e.htm
thought i was reading an article about the maori in new zealand for a bit there!!!

User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 21834
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 11:02 pm
Location: Frutillar, Chile
Contact:

Re: OCEANFRONT TITLE RESTRICTIONS

Post by admin » Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:12 pm

One of the effects of Bachelet administration was to make a mess out of a mess, by promising all kinds of stuff to shut groups up in Chile, and then not following through.
Spencer Global Chile: Legal, relocation, and Investment assistance in Chile.
For more information visit: https://www.spencerglobal.com

From USA and outside Chile dial 1-917-727-5985 (U.S.), in Chile dial 65 2 42 1024 or by cell 747 97974.

User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 21834
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 11:02 pm
Location: Frutillar, Chile
Contact:

Re: OCEANFRONT TITLE RESTRICTIONS

Post by admin » Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:13 pm

By the way, she did that to the students and the mapuche. Guess what has happened?
Spencer Global Chile: Legal, relocation, and Investment assistance in Chile.
For more information visit: https://www.spencerglobal.com

From USA and outside Chile dial 1-917-727-5985 (U.S.), in Chile dial 65 2 42 1024 or by cell 747 97974.

User avatar
zer0nz
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
Posts: 5779
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 4:46 am
Location: Lost!
Contact:

Re: OCEANFRONT TITLE RESTRICTIONS

Post by zer0nz » Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:19 pm

admin wrote:By the way, she did that to the students and the mapuche. Guess what has happened?

now we just need to find a way to get the students to fight with the mapuche and leave them all to it :)

oregon woodsmoke
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
Posts: 351
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:23 pm

Re: OCEANFRONT TITLE RESTRICTIONS

Post by oregon woodsmoke » Wed Sep 28, 2011 8:49 pm

What? Wait a minute. Fishermen squatting at high tide?

I'm on it. Itty bitty travel trailer, a fishing pole, and all of a sudden I have beach front property. Pull it down the road to the next beach if the government comes to move me out.

And to think, I was planning on paying money for beach property. I've got a new plan now.

Post Reply