Just a couple pointers for people who might not yet be familiar with the "middle income trap" framework, which I've come to believe is very relevant to today's Chile:
- http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2012/0 ... -protests/
- http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2012/0 ... c-success/
- http://www.americasquarterly.org/node/2142
As I've posted in a couple different threads, I believe that until we see significant productivity increases in daily real-world activities in this country - insane notary paperwork, sluggish retail interactions, waiting in line in banks that close at 2pm... - Chile will remain stuck pretty much where it is now in its second world status with pockets of wealth in a sea of poverty and ignorance. When Sodimac starts selling something else than self-destructing tools from China, when Cencosud gets a clue on specialty ecommerce, when people start thinking holistically and beyond tomorrow... Until then, I'm betting on Chile staying stuck at middle income levels.
People like Larrain think that "development" is a macro measurement that can be boiled down to GDP/capita. I contend that this is very mistaken and doesn't recognize quality of life and real purchasing power that most people have in real developed countries (which, by the way does *not* start at Portugal's level, but significantly above). Until Chile gets the First World basics of service productivity right, I don't buy the "path to developed country" pitch. High copper exports and booming domestic retail sales alone won't translate into a developed country.


