by Donnybrook » Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:50 am
Well, I know how much pleasure you get out of writing your posts and didn't think any input from me could add to that pleasure. Also, taking care of a sick husband tends to sap one's social graces. I apologise and will try to expand my "very interesting" a bit for you but I can probably only summon some random thoughts.
This Rotem seems to have gotten a worse deal than the Czech tourist who started the last big fire. I wondered why that was. The Czech did admit to starting the fire and did seem genuinely horrified at what he had done. But he paid his small fine and went home. His government did offer some sort of restitution, although I can't remember if it took the form of just money or also sending experts (in fires? in parks? in reforestation?). I did search around and try to see if anything ever really happened about this but only found references to their promises and nothing concrete about what they actually did or didn't do.
The roughly US$10,000 is way beyond the sum mentioned as the maximum fine under the Ley de Bosques (or Ley del Bosque?) which the media told us, was all they would be able to squeeze out of him. This, in fact, led to some barn door reactions by authorities and promises to give the law some teeth in the future. This, in turn, made me wonder why it seemed preferable to Rotem (or his lawyers, or the Israeli government) to avoid the court proceedings if it was not going to be a big deal financially and he couldn't be jailed for longer than 60 days (not that I would want to spend 60 days in jail). According to his lawyers there was little direct evidence to link him to the fire. If that was so, why not go to court and watch the government try to win its case? Even if they won, the consequences did not seem catastrophic.
The fact that part of the deal was for Rotem to remain in Chile for two years and actually have some hands on time with the reforestation - or whatever the plan is - was also interesting to me. Perhaps I missed something along the way as I have mainly used your posts to follow the story, but I don't remember anyone mentioning the possibility that the outcome of the legal issues included remaining in the country beyond the time before the trial. It seemed the plot was simpler than that and would end with a slap on the wrist for Rotem and a cheque from the Israeli government.
Since some of the things you mentioned were surprising, I found them interesting. I probably should have included a thank you with my comment as you took the time to write such an informative post, one which interested me. So, a belated thank you. In future, if I cannot summon more than a couple of words, I will mutter my "very interesting' to myself for fear of causing offense by the paucity of my input.
Sleepless nights. As they say, tell me about it.