j. Ro wrote:If I had to pick on sex to fix, I would lean toward spaying all the female dogs… if you miss one male her can impregnate all the females in the area. But if you miss a female she can only have on litter every few months.
after some thought I see what you are saying and agree. The cost of neutering and spaying is probably the most expensive aspect of such a plan. Your idea of fixing just the females is likely the most cost effective. Certainly more humane than euthanizing one or both sexes.
In time: one could sympathize with all the multitudes of male dogs ... chasing after the very few remaining fertile female ones. Could in the end be a good way to find the last remaining fertile females ... looking for crowds of male dogs gathering, etc.
I chatted with a friend from an East Asian country on this topic of dog control after posting here just the other day. She said that street dogs are rarely vicious. She also pointed out, as others have here, that the killing of dogs (she indicated the use of guns) was intended to control diseases from which street dogs suffer.
I understand that some people identify with animals more than others, and there are other differences among people relating to these issues, too. I personally have a hard time conceiving of euthanizing a living being out of mercy just because it is diseased - unless it is in seriously, nearly mortifying pain. Do I have a better, less expensive or equally as costly solution? No, I do not.

-DK