Moderator: eeuunikkeiexpat

Re: Argentina - they didn't learn last time

Postby Chuck J 3.0 » Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:36 pm

greg~judy wrote:OK... anyone perverse enough to start dabbling in the stock plays here.
......



:mrgreen: How can I short Argentina? Seems like a good play.
User avatar
Chuck J 3.0
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
 
Posts: 817
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 8:04 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Argentina - they didn't learn last time

Postby oregon woodsmoke » Fri Feb 26, 2010 9:41 pm

Looking at that map, it looks to me like Chile has as much claim to the oil area as Argentina does. If you are going to extend borders out into the ocean and stake your claim that way.
oregon woodsmoke
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
 
Posts: 350
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:23 pm

Re: Argentina - they didn't learn last time

Postby greg~judy » Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:05 pm

An interesting comment - more little known history?
http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilder ... ents-22311

A fact often dismissed by the British is that the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht signed by the UK and Spain (among other European powers), gave Spain continued control of her colonies in the Americas, including all adjacent islands. Simply put, the UK gave up any claims to the Malvinas/Falklands Islands to Spain by signed treaty. The islands then became part of Spain's Viceroyalty of the Rio de la Plata. When Argentina declared independence from Spain and became The United Provinces of the Rio de la Plata, it claimed all territories previously administered by the Viceroyalty. In 1825, the UK recognized the newly formed Republic, which included territorial recognition. In 1833 the UK takes over the Malvinas/Falklands not because it retained some form of claim at that time, but rather because it could. The UK was at the height of imperial expansion and it went around the world taking whatever it wanted. That simple. Argentina never gave up its claim to the islands. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Argentina and the UK became very close allies and it was expected by both nations that the islands would be returned to Argentina somewhere along the line. In fact, until the early 1970s, the UK proposed the return of the islands to Argentina to the islanders, who did not want to become part of Argentina. Who could blame them? Does anyone want to join a country often ruled by military dictators? But still, the UK was proposing this to the islanders. In 1976 the UK decided not to return the islands after becoming aware of vast deposits of oil on the Malvinas/Falklands basin. The UK claims that they are simply looking after the interest of the islanders. Well, this is coming from the same nation that expelled all inhabitants out of Diego Garcia and gave the islands the USA to build a military base. Bottom line, this is one of the many front lines in the battle over natural resources. If there was no oil and no strategic access to Antarctica, I truly believe that UK would have returned the islands by now. As for the islanders, I'm sure they would be welcomed in the UK.
Last edited by greg~judy on Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
“Most ignorance is vincible ignorance.
We don’t know because we don’t want to know.”

↑↑↑ aldous huxley ↓↓↓
“There are things known and there are things unknown,
and in between are the doors of perception.”
User avatar
greg~judy
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 2:00 pm
Location: citoyens de monde

Re: Argentina - they didn't learn last time

Postby GJJIM » Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:54 pm

Yes, those pesky natural resources again. Funny how industrialized nations can't seem to get by without steady streams of oil, coal, copper, iron ore, etc. Nations that depend on high growth rates to maintain their domestic and economic stability are even more needy. It's also interesting that the world has many countries rich in natural resources and some of them are sparsely-populated and have weak military capabilities...

:frighten:
GJJIM
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
 
Posts: 397
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:33 pm
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: Argentina - they didn't learn last time

Postby FrankPintor » Tue Mar 23, 2010 4:30 am

Actually, at some level I expect the Argentineans did learn... and actually there wasn't a whole lot to learn considering how close they came to winning the islands last time around. Basically all they had to do was declare war (or make their move) 2-3 months later than they did, just before the South Atlantic winter made military action impossible. They couldn't because growing unrest in Argentina forced the dictatorship's hand, and because of that the extension to the airfield at Stanley couldn't be finished (it was being fabricated in Argentina)... which meant that when war broke out, the Argentinean air force found itself operating at the limit of its range, without being able to land and refuel on the islands... in winter in the South Atlantic, which should have been to the Argentineans' advantage (i.e. strike, capture, and have the weather shut everything down... there would have been no more military action for several months). I shared a beer with more than one English contractor who suddenly found himself at sea when Maggie ordered her navy to set sail, and they agreed (with graphic demonstrations of jets in flight over a table full of beers) :shock: that the courage and skill shown by the Argentinean pilots was amazing, not simply in launching missiles, but in evading them, and even with the incompetent leadership of Galtieri came close to making it count for Argentina.

Argentina knows that for 4-6 long months of the year the Malvinas can't be resupplied... so does the UK. I guess it's a question of when, and on which terms, not if...
You are disturbing me. I am picking mushrooms.
User avatar
FrankPintor
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
 
Posts: 596
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: Caracas

Re: Argentina - they didn't learn last time

Postby nwdiver » Tue Mar 23, 2010 3:24 pm

FrankPintor wrote:Actually, at some level I expect the Argentineans did learn... and actually there wasn't a whole lot to learn considering how close they came to winning the islands last time around. Basically all they had to do was declare war (or make their move) 2-3 months later than they did, just before the South Atlantic winter made military action impossible. They couldn't because growing unrest in Argentina forced the dictatorship's hand, and because of that the extension to the airfield at Stanley couldn't be finished (it was being fabricated in Argentina)... which meant that when war broke out, the Argentinean air force found itself operating at the limit of its range, without being able to land and refuel on the islands... in winter in the South Atlantic, which should have been to the Argentineans' advantage (i.e. strike, capture, and have the weather shut everything down... there would have been no more military action for several months). I shared a beer with more than one English contractor who suddenly found himself at sea when Maggie ordered her navy to set sail, and they agreed (with graphic demonstrations of jets in flight over a table full of beers) :shock: that the courage and skill shown by the Argentinean pilots was amazing, not simply in launching missiles, but in evading them, and even with the incompetent leadership of Galtieri came close to making it count for Argentina.

Argentina knows that for 4-6 long months of the year the Malvinas can't be resupplied... so does the UK. I guess it's a question of when, and on which terms, not if...


You think the Brits couldn’t fight a winter war, your dreaming, and with their jump jets they proved they didn’t need a runway, and they would have removed Agrie airpower with one or two strikes and then flooded the area with subs, the Argies never had a chance of winning from day one it was silly for them to take on Thatcher just stupid.
It's all about the wine.
User avatar
nwdiver
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 8:45 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC and Chile where ever it's Summer

Re: Argentina - they didn't learn last time

Postby Annie » Tue Mar 23, 2010 3:35 pm

yes definitely ... " The pirates " can fight wars around the world anytime, thats their job!!!
Annie & Tom
User avatar
Annie
Rank: Chile Forum Tourist
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:18 pm

Re: Argentina - they didn't learn last time

Postby greg~judy » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:55 am

OK... anyone perverse enough to start dabbling in the stock plays here.
Let's see some money, where mouths are... :lol:
Who will be the first to jump into the UK exploration market -
- to declare short/long positions on any/all of the players below????

...a British oil rig sent by Desire Petroleum Plc (UK:DES 107.50, +0.50, +0.47%) began drilling in disputed waters off the coast of the Falklands


Today's update...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8592734.stm
Shares in Desire Petroleum have almost halved (51.00) after the oil explorer said a well being drilled off the Falkland Islands may not be economically viable.

Anybody short Desire??? :D :D :D
“Most ignorance is vincible ignorance.
We don’t know because we don’t want to know.”

↑↑↑ aldous huxley ↓↓↓
“There are things known and there are things unknown,
and in between are the doors of perception.”
User avatar
greg~judy
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 2:00 pm
Location: citoyens de monde

Re: Argentina - they didn't learn last time

Postby direct » Tue Mar 30, 2010 10:51 am

I thought I read somewhere just recently that the oil exploration in the area was disappointing so maybe the poms will lay less claim now to the Malvinas
direct
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 9:50 pm
Location: Recreo - Vina del Mar

Re: Argentina - they didn't learn last time

Postby greg~judy » Thu May 06, 2010 6:09 pm

Time for a bump...
OK... anyone perverse enough to start dabbling in the stock plays here.
Let's see some money, where mouths are... :lol:
Who will be the first to jump into the UK exploration market -
- to declare short/long positions on any/all of the players below????

British firm set to invoke fury of Argentina as it strikes black gold in the Falklands
big rig.jpg
big rig.jpg (109.72 KiB) Viewed 873 times

Rockhopper Exploration today announced that it has made an oil discovery in the North Falkland Basin - the first oil find of an exploration programme in the Falkland Islands that has already pushed relations between London and Buenos Aires to breaking point.

Shares in Rockhopper soared 138 per cent on the news. Shares in Desire Petroleum, another North Falklands-focused explorer, gained 85 per cent in the hope that it, too, will strike black gold.

... the oil find was very positive for Rockhopper and the share price reaction was not overdone, but cautioned that more information was needed on the quality of the oil reservoirs.

'If it does prove to be good quality reservoir, we're looking at maybe a discovery of a couple of hundred million barrels. It's very significant.'

Rockhopper said today that initial data collected from the Sea Lion prospect indicated that well 14/10-2 had found oil at intervals across 53 metres, which was 25 metres at its thickest point.

The company said it would carry out an additional assessment of the well before making a decision on whether to plug and abandon it or suspend it for future testing.

It added it would also consider whether to drill a further appraisal well on the prospect.
“Most ignorance is vincible ignorance.
We don’t know because we don’t want to know.”

↑↑↑ aldous huxley ↓↓↓
“There are things known and there are things unknown,
and in between are the doors of perception.”
User avatar
greg~judy
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 2:00 pm
Location: citoyens de monde

Re: Argentina - they didn't learn last time

Postby GJJIM » Thu May 06, 2010 6:13 pm

IIRC, the test wells showed the "big find" was a dry hole, a nothingburger. Or, as Rosana Rosana Dana used to say "Never mind". :alien:
GJJIM
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
 
Posts: 397
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:33 pm
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: Argentina - they didn't learn last time

Postby Wedding Photographer » Thu May 06, 2010 9:18 pm

Chuck J 3.0 wrote:I think the Argie's have a lot better chance now. The political climate has changed quite a bit in England, I don't think the UK Govt. can count on patriotic chest-thumping crowds to support them in taking back the Falklands this time, if Argentina invades.


I will thump my chest loud and strong!! i lost my brother there and there he now lays..
Wedding Photographer / Fotografo Matrimonios
http://www.weddingphotochile.com
Destination Wedding Photography
http://www.GardnerHamilton.com
User avatar
Wedding Photographer
Rank: Chile Forum Citizen
 
Posts: 222
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:35 pm
Location: Vina del mar y Santiago

PreviousNext

Return to Lobby

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users