Laura55llc wrote:And as someone who, unfortunately never learned Spanish, but knows something of the history of the US, parts of which were settled by the Spanish.
I, or you? I've learned Spanish, though with an accent which clearly identifies me as Argentine, which I'm not. I'll work on accent reduction later, I think.
Laura55llc wrote:Their ancestors continue to prefer Spanish to this day.
The
descendants of Spanish settlers, you mean? The few I've been acquainted with -- and there were few to begin with, as the indigenous peoples of the Southwest were numerous -- speak both languages and always employ English in public. Most "hispanics" are descended from the Indians who were conquered by the Spanish and often were forced to adopt Spanish. English has been encouraged over the past 160+ years but not forced upon an unwilling people, let alone accompanied by torture and execution.
Laura55llc wrote:I remember an "English Only" proposition in Colorado years ago that would have required the change of many streets, counties, rivers...the list goes on and on. Colorado itself is a Spanish name.
A nation needs a single, uniting public language. Haven't we had this discussion before? Or am I experiencing imagined
deja vu? (By the way, "Colorado" is pronounced by the natives very differently, something like "kah-lah-RAY-duh".)
Laura55llc wrote:Personally, I find it nice that Chileans are kind to immigrants with poor Spanish skills.
So do I. And for my part, I encourage immigrants to the States -- legal immigrants, who genuinely desire to become part of the country -- even tutoring some without charge.
There is, however, a big difference between a foreigner struggling with the language and a worker here who, though in a job which requires her to deal with the public, nevertheless refuses to speak or acknowledge understanding of English. I would myself be ashamed to act that way in Mexico, Chile, or any other foreign land.