MikieO wrote:. . . . a reference to the eternal victim aspect of the WW2 Jewish population and the ongoing, seemingly eternal hunt for the last Dollar, Deutsch mark and/or Nazi.
. . . . it's fully 60 years since the end of WW2 yet we are still treated to quarterly feature films referencing the Nazis and their victims, my daughter is subject to a school field trip to a Holocaust Memorial Museum and here we are, discussing alleged horrors that took place 60 plus years ago, why? Because we are constantly reminded of these happenings and urged to "never forget". A bit like the Brits shouldn't forget the murders of their officers and civilians in a terrorist bombing of a hotel a mere 55 yrs ago ? No, this is taboo ....
First, a disclaimer: I've relatives and dear friends who are Jewish, and I do think that the Fascist and Nazi treatment of Jews
simply because they were Jews was damnable. Fascist and Nazi treatment of other people, whether or not it was because of the groups they belonged to, was equally damnable.
But I agree with Mikie -- or, at least, with what I believe him to be saying and implying: what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander: equal treatment. The bombing of a hotel in Jerusalem and the mass murder of an entire village of men, women, children, and even dogs (the latter,
simply because of the group the inhabitants belonged to) was equally contemptible; why, then, do we never hear of these terrorist acts, even when the perpetrator is chosen head of the state erected upon the blood and suffering of the dead?
And what of that once-daunting, now cant phrase, "never again"? "Never again" tolerate such mass murder? Well, then, why did we stand by while the Cambodian communists killed a quarter or a third of their own people? We knew what was happening, but neither the West nor Israel did anything. Or when Idi Amin killed and tortured? Or while the Sudanese and Zimbabwean governments do the same today? Double standards, indeed.