by RWS on Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:56 pm
In my experience, jalundberg, what Charles has observed is correct. I've studied at American, English, and Argentine universities, and the differences between them, particularly in academic rigor, is marked. You likely will not receive as thorough an academic education in Chile as you would in the United States (why do you think that Chilean families that can afford to do so prefer to send their sons and daughters to American or even Canadian or British universities?). But much depends upon your field, the faculty in Chile, and even the value you place upon the experience itself (taking a Chilean master's degree in sociology, for example, with a thesis on racial consciousness in indigenous Andean communities would make sense, as you could do field work more easily and, better, could through the process itself make ancillary observations that would set your study apart from the humdrum).
Charles's admonition to be able to research and write well should be underlined. I find more and more young Americans -- I don't say you're one of them! -- with wasted intelligence, unhoned and inarticulate (perhaps not simply inarticulate, as they often seem never to have formed the thoughts that they would be unable to express). Being able to speak, read, and think with precision and understanding formerly was the mark of a "university man". Now it is sufficiently uncommon that having that ability to think and communicate will, with application and care, gain you admission to at least a decent graduate program; the best, though, still require either a high degree of exercised intelligence or a parental Maecenas.