by admin on Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:12 pm
well, read the article. Just more political smoke and mirrors. Do you really think home land security has the computing capacity to properly data mind and anyalise thousands and thousands of disk images. If you gave me just one 100 GB or 200 GB drive to examine for "bad things", a fast check would take me all day. That would not be a detailed report, but just a fast scan to see what is obvious and not even just sort of hidden say by renaming a file as something common. Anything with even the weakest encryption could take weeks, if almost impossible to break. Even with just a few mb, an encrypted file takes a lot of horsepower to crack by brute force.
It is just technological / political BS show.
That said, as a rule I never fly in to the United States with used computer for one very good reason, I am typically there to buy a new computer anyway.
If it is important leave it online, which this article correctly points out makes all this doubly stupid. While in the States I regularly worked on my computers at home in Chile using SSH through an encrypted tunnel to connect to my home network, servers, and other things. I don't keep data on my notebook mostly for fear of having it stolen when traveling, and now fear of having it stolen by some knuckle head at TSA who likely has trouble turning his own home windows computer on. anyone with more than a basic user level of understanding of a computer could defeat or evade these "security" measures. So, what is the point other than intimidation?
Last edited by
admin on Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.