by admin on Sat Nov 17, 2007 2:36 am
First on the TV issue, I have not owned a TV on a regular basis for at least 10 or 12 years. I even pay for cable, but have no TV (internet and phone, cable comes with the package). I think my total hours watching cable this year was about 10 hours, and most of that was in Hotel rooms as I was traveling.
Keeps my brain from rotting. All my media comes through the internet for the most part, plus some local papers.
Yea, I had some friends from Colombia visit for a couple of weeks. I don't think I had to ask them to repeat themselves more than perhaps once or twice in two weeks.
I have been to Spain, and I have had several Spanish teachers from Madrid. I don't find Spain Spanish any easier to understand really. I also don't find Spanish in Peru that much easier to understand. I would expect the linguistic drift would be fairly small between the two countries, but at least to my ear it does not seem to be.
There is some sort of theory (I am not sure I buy it), that the larger the distance between a language population and the source of its origin, the more "frozen" in time it gets relative to the time it migrated.
Yea, that one was thrown out there by a Shakespear professor I had years ago. Through all my linguistic related courses I suffered through in graduate school, I don't recall anyone even trying to test the waters with a similar theory.
I don't believe you can stop language evolution and still have a natural language. It is a very fast moving target. That is why dictionaries need updating, and Children will invent more words than dictionaries can hold, and Colombians likely sound nothing like their 15th century Spanish ancestors.